Greenscreen decreases Type I Errors and increases true peak detection in genomic datasets including ChIP-seq
bioRxiv, ISSN: 2692-8205
2022
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) is used widely to identify both factor binding to genomic DNA and chromatin modifications. Analysis of ChIP-seq data is impacted by regions of the genome which generate ultra-high artifactual signals. To remove these signals from ChIP-seq data, ENCODE developed blacklists, comprehensive sets of regions defined by low mappability and ultra-high signals for human, mouse, worm, and flies. Currently, blacklists are not available for many model and non-model species. Here we describe an alternative approach for removing false-positive peaks we called “greenscreen”. Greenscreen is facile to implement, requires few input samples, and uses analysis tools frequently employed for ChIP-seq. We show that greenscreen removes artifact signal as effectively as blacklists in Arabidopsis and human ChIP-seq datasets while covering less of the genome, dramatically improving ChIP-seq data quality. Greenscreen filtering reveals true factor binding overlap and of occupancy changes in different genetic backgrounds or tissues. Because it is effective with as few as three inputs, greenscreen is readily adaptable for use in any species or genome build. Although developed for ChIP-seq, greenscreen also identifies artifact signals from other genomic datasets including CUT&RUN. Finally, we present an improved ChIP-seq pipeline which incorporates greenscreen, that detects more true peaks than published methods.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know