Genome polarisation for detecting barriers to geneflow
bioRxiv, ISSN: 2692-8205
2022
- 2Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
Article Description
Semi-permeable barriers to geneflow in principle allow distantly related organisms to capture and exchange pre-adapted genes potentially speeding adaptation. However, describing barriers to geneflow on a genomic scale is non-trivial. We extend classic diagnostic allele counting measures of geneflow across a barrier to the case of genome-scale data. Diagnostic index expectation maximisation (diem) polarises the labelling of bistate markers with respect to the sides of a barrier. An initial state of ignorance is enforced by starting with randomly generated marker polarisations. This means there is no prior on population or taxon membership of the genomes concerned. Using a deterministic data labelling, small numbers of classic diagnostic markers can be replaced by large numbers of markers, each with a diagnostic index. Individuals' hybrid indices (genome admixture proportions) are then calculated genome wide conditioned on marker diagnosticity; within diploid, haplodiploid and/or haploid genome compartments; or indeed over any subset of markers, allowing classical cline width/barrier strength comparisons along genomes. Along-genome barrier strength heterogeneity allows for barrier regions to be identified. Further, blocks of genetic material that have introgressed across a barrier are easily identified with high power. diem indicates panmixis among Myotis myotis bat genomes, with a barrier separating low data quality outliers. In a Mus musculus domesticus/Mus spretus system, diem adds multiple introgressions of olfactory (and vomeronasal) gene clusters in one direction to previous demonstrations of a pesticide resistance gene introgressing in the opposite direction across a strong species barrier. diem is a genomes analysis solution which scales over reduced representation genomics of thousands of markers to treatment of all variant sites in large genomes. While the method lends itself to visualisation, its output of markers with barrier-informative annotation will fuel research in population genetics, phylogenetics and association studies. diem can equip such downstream applications with millions of informative markers.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know