On the estimation of beat-to-beat time domain heart rate variability indices from smoothed heart rate time series
medRxiv
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study tests the feasibility of estimating some time-domain heart rate variability indices (the standard deviation of the RR time series, SDNN, and the standard deviation of the differentiated RR time series, or RMSSD) from smoothed and rounded to the nearest beat per minute heart period time series using shallow neural networks. These time series are often stored in wearable devices instead of the beat-to-beat RR time series. Because the algorithm for obtaining the recorded mean heart rate in wearable devices is often not disclosed, this study test different hypothetic sampling strategies and smoothers. Sixteen features extracted from 5 minute smoothed heart period time series were employed to train, validate, and test shallow neural networks in order to provide estimates of the SDNN and RMSSD indices from freely available public databases RR time series. The results show that, using the proposed features, the median relative error (averaged for each database) in the SDNN ranges from 2% to 14% depending on the smoothness, sampling strategy, and database. The RMSSD is harder to estimate, and its median relative error ranges from 6% to 32%. The proposed methodology can be easily extended to other averaged heart rate time series, HRV indices and supervised learning algorithms
Bibliographic Details
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know