Online detection of auditory attention with mobile EEG: Closing the loop with neurofeedback
bioRxiv, ISSN: 2692-8205
2017
- 7Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef6
- Patent Family Citations1
- Patent Families1
Article Description
Auditory attention detection (AAD) is promising for use in auditory-assistive devices to detect to which sound the user is attending. Being able to train subjects in achieving high AAD performance would greatly increase its application potential. In order to do so an acceptable temporal resolution and online implementation are essential prerequisites. Consequently, users of an online AAD can be presented with feedback about their performance. Here we describe two studies that investigate the effects of online AAD with feedback. In the first study, we implemented a fully automated closed-loop system that allows for user-friendly recording environments. Subjects were presented online with visual feedback on their ongoing AAD performance. Following these results we implemented a longitudinal case study in which two subjects were presented with AAD sessions during four weeks. The results prove the feasibility of a fully working online (neuro)feedback system for AAD decoding. The detected changes in AAD for the feedback subject during and after training suggest that changes in AAD may be achieved via training. This is early evidence of such training effects and needs to be confirmed in future studies to evaluate training of AAD in more detail. Finally, the large number of sessions allowed to examine the correlation between the stimuli (i.e. acoustic stories) and AAD performance which was found to be significant. Future studies are suggested to evaluate their acoustic stimuli with care to prevent spurious associations.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know