Evaluation of colorectal cancer subtypes and cell lines using deep learning
bioRxiv, ISSN: 2692-8205
2018
- 2Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
Article Description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer with a high mortality rate and rising incidence rate in the developed world. Molecular profiling techniques have been used to study the variability between tumours as well as cancer models such as cell lines, but their translational value is incomplete with current methods. Moreover, first generation computational methods for subtype classification do not make use of multi-omics data in full scale. Drug discovery programs use cell lines as a proxy for human cancers to characterize their molecular makeup and drug response, identify relevant indications and discover biomarkers. In order to maximize the translatability and the clinical relevance of in vitro studies, selection of optimal cancer models is imperative. We present a novel subtype classification method based on deep learning and apply it to classify CRC tumors using multi-omics data, and further to measure the similarity between tumors and disease models such as cancer cell lines. Multi-omics Autoencoder Integration (maui) efficiently leverages data sets containing copy number alterations, gene expression, and point mutations, and learns clinically important patterns (latent factors) across these data types. Using these latent factors, we propose a refinement of the gold-standard CRC subtypes, and propose best-matching cell lines for the different subtypes. These findings are relevant for patient stratification and selection of cell lines for drug discovery pipelines, biomarker discovery, and target identification.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know