A Comparison of Deep Neural Networks for Seizure Detection in EEG Signals
bioRxiv, ISSN: 2692-8205
2019
- 6Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef6
Article Description
This paper aims to apply machine learning techniques to an automated epileptic seizure detection using EEG signals to help neurologists in a time-consuming diagnostic process. We employ two approaches based on convolution neural networks (CNNs) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) to provide a probability of seizure occurrence in a windowed EEG recording of 18 channels. In order to extract relevant features based on time, frequency, and time-frequency domains for these networks, we consider an improvement of the Bayesian error rate from a baseline. Features of which the improvement rates are higher than the significant level are considered. These dominant features extracted from all EEG channels are concatenated as the input for ANN with 7 hidden layers, while the input of CNN is taken as raw multi-channel EEG signals. Using multi-concept of deep CNN in image processing, we exploit 2D-filter decomposition to handle the signal in spatial and temporal domains. Our experiments based on CHB-MIT Scalp EEG Database showed that both ANN and CNN were able to perform with the overall accuracy of up to 99.07% and F1-score of up to 77.04%. ANN with dominant features is more capable of detecting seizure events than CNN whereas CNN requiring no feature extraction is slightly better than ANN in classification accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know