Untangling the effects of cellular composition on coexpression analysis
bioRxiv, ISSN: 2692-8205
2019
- 5Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef5
Article Description
Coexpression analysis is one of the most widely used methods in genomics, with applications to inferring regulatory networks, predicting gene function, and interpretation of transcriptome profiling studies. Most studies use data collected from bulk tissue, where the effects of cellular composition present a potential confound. However, the impact of composition on coexpression analysis have not been studied in detail. Here we examine this issue for the case of human brain RNA analysis.We found that for most genes, differences in expression levels across cell types account for a large fraction of the variance of their measured RNA levels in brain (median R = 0.64). We then show that genes that have similar expression patterns across cell types will have correlated RNA levels in bulk tissue, due to the effect of variation in cellular composition. We demonstrate that much of the coexpression in the bulk tissue can be attributed to this effect. We further show how this composition-induced coexpression masks underlying intra-cell-type coexpression observed in single-cell data. Attempt to correct for composition yielded mixed results.The dominant coexpression signal in brain can be attributed to cellular compositional effects, rather than intra-cell-type regulatory relationships, and this is likely to be true for other tissues. These results have important implications for the relevance and interpretation of coexpression in many applications.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know