Regulatory principles governing tissue specificity of developmental enhancers
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, ISSN: 1943-4456, Vol: 80, Page: 27-32
2016
- 19Citations
- 56Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- CrossRef19
- 18
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Affinity-optimizing enhancer variants disrupt development
Nature, Published online: 17 January 2024; doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06922-8 Low-affinity transcription factor binding sites are prevalent across the genome, and single nucleotide changes that increase binding affinity even slightly can cause gain-of-function gene expression and phenotypes (such as polydactyly).
Conference Paper Description
Transcriptional enhancers are short segments of genomic DNA (50 bp to 1 kb in length) that can work over long distances (≥1 Mb) to regulate gene expression in specific cells and tissues. Genomic assays have identified on the order of 400,000 to one million putative enhancers in the human genome (e.g., ENCODE Consortium). This suggests that a typical gene is regulated by tens of enhancers, ensuring stringent regulation of gene expression in response to a variety of intrinsic and external signals. Despite the discovery of the first transcriptional enhancer more than 30 years ago, we know surprisingly little about how enhancers regulate gene expression. In particular, the relationship between primary DNA sequence and enhancer specificity remains obscure. Here we summarize recent high-throughput studies in whole embryos aimed at the systematic identification of the sequence and organizational constraints underlying enhancer function and specificity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978758077&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027227; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27325706; http://symposium.cshlp.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027227; https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027227; https://symposium.cshlp.org/content/80/27
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know