Bubble dynamics: (Nucleating) radiation inside dust
Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, ISSN: 1550-7998, Vol: 84, Issue: 2
2011
- 7Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We consider two spatially flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetimes divided by a timelike thin shell in the nontrivial case in which the inner region of finite extension contains radiation and the outer region is filled with dust. We will then show that, while the evolution is determined by a large set of constraints, an analytical description for the evolution of the bubble radius can be obtained by formally expanding for short times after the shell attains its minimum size. In particular, we will find that a bubble of radiation, starting out with vanishing expansion speed, can be matched with an expanding dust exterior, but not with a collapsing dust exterior, regardless of the dust energy density. The former case can then be used to describe the nucleation of a bubble of radiation inside an expanding dust cloud, although the final configuration contains more energy than the initial dust, and the reverse process, with collapsing radiation transforming into collapsing dust, is therefore energetically favored. We however speculate a (small) decaying vacuum energy or cosmological constant inside dust could still trigger nucleation. Finally, our perturbative (yet analytical) approach can be easily adapted to different combinations of matter inside and outside the shell, as well as to more general surface density, of relevance for cosmology and studies of defect formation during phase transitions. © 2011 American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80051693875&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.84.024006; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024006; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024006/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.024006
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know