Unconditional continuous-variable dense coding
Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, ISSN: 1094-1622, Vol: 66, Issue: 4, Page: 5-null
2002
- 40Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We investigate the conditions under which unconditional dense coding can be achieved using continuous-variable entanglement. We consider the effect of entanglement impurity and detector efficiency and discuss experimental verification. We conclude that the requirements for a strong demonstration are not as stringent as previously thought, and are within the reach of present technology. 5555 2002 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84892427977&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.66.042321; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036818611&origin=inward; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042321; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042321/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042321
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know