Spectral properties of the Anderson impurity model: Comparison of numerical-renormalization-group and noncrossing-approximation results
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, ISSN: 1550-235X, Vol: 53, Issue: 4, Page: 1850-1865
1996
- 116Citations
- 51Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A comparative study of the numerical-renormalization group and noncrossing-approximation (NCA) results for the spectral functions of the U=∞ Anderson impurity model is carried out. The noncrossing approximation is the simplest conserving approximation and has led to useful insights into strongly correlated models of magnetic impurities. At low energies and temperatures the method is known to be inaccurate for dynamical properties due to the appearance of singularities in the physical Green’s functions. The problems in developing alternative reliable theories for dynamical properties have made it difficult to quantify these inaccuracies. In this paper we show, by direct comparison with essentially exact numerical-renormalization-group calculations for the auxiliary and physical particle spectral functions, that the main source of error in the noncrossing approximation is in the lack of vertex corrections in the convolution formulas for physical Green’s functions. We show that the dynamics of the auxiliary particles within the NCA is essentially correct for a large parameter region, including the physically interesting Kondo regime, for all energy scales down to (Formula presented), the low-energy scale of the model and often well below this scale. Despite the satisfactory description of the auxiliary particle dynamics, the physical spectral functions are not obtained accurately on scales ∼(Formula presented). Our results suggest that self-consistent conserving approximations which include vertex terms may provide a highly accurate way of dealing with strongly correlated systems at low temperatures. © 1996 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0000843494&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.53.1850; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9983643; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1850; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1850/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1850
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know