Comment on “dynamical properties of small polarons”
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, ISSN: 1550-235X, Vol: 59, Issue: 18, Page: 12132-12134
1999
- 25Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef19
Article Description
We show that the conclusion on the breakdown of the standard small polaron theory made recently by E. V. de Mello and J. Ranninger [Phys. Rev. B 55, 14 872 (1997)] is a result of an incorrect interpretation of the electronic and vibronic energy levels of the two-site Holstein model. The small polaron theory, when properly applied, agrees well with the numerical results of these authors. Also we show that their attempt to connect the properties of the calculated correlation functions with the features of the intersite electron hopping is unsuccessful. © 1999 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0000287197&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.12132; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12132; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12132/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12132
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know