Inhomogeneous strain relaxation in triple-barrier (formula presented) nanostructures
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, ISSN: 1550-235X, Vol: 60, Issue: 24, Page: 16597-16602
1999
- 6Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Resonant tunneling measurements are used to probe size-induced strain relaxation in p-Si/SiGe triple-barrier nanostructures with a narrow (∼10 Å) middle barrier, where the confined subbands depend strongly on the strain and bias-dependent coupling between the two neighboring quantum wells. In structures with (Formula presented) diameter, shifts in the strain-dependent subband energies are clearly observable in the tunneling current. Further, in the smallest structures (Formula presented) tunneling through discrete states confined by inhomogeneous-strain-induced lateral potentials dominates the (Formula presented) Magnetotunneling measurements on a (Formula presented) structure reveal a ∼75-Å effective length of the strain-induced lateral confinement potential. Based on our previous measurements of double-barrier nanostructures and the finite element calculations of the strain distribution in these triple-barrier structures, we conclude that the (Formula presented) peak shifts in larger devices are due to uniform strain relaxation, whereas in smaller devices the fine structure in the (Formula presented) is due to coupled inhomogeneous-strain-induced discrete quantum-dot or ring states in neighboring wells. © 1999 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0001528648&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.60.16597; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.16597; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.16597/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.16597
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know