Superconductivity, intragrain penetration depth, and Meissner effect of (formula presented)
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, ISSN: 1550-235X, Vol: 66, Issue: 1, Page: 1-5
2002
- 31Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The hole concentration (formula presented) the transition temperature (formula presented) the intragrain penetration depth (formula presented) and the Meissner effect were measured for annealed (formula presented) samples. The intragrain superconducting transition temperature (formula presented) varied from 17 to 40 K while the p changed by only (formula presented) The intragrain superfluid density (formula presented) and the diamagnetic drop of the field-cooled magnetization across (formula presented) (the Meissner effect), however, increased more than 10 times. All of these findings are in disagreement with both the (formula presented) vs p and the (formula presented) vs (formula presented) correlations proposed for homogeneous cuprates, but are in line with a possible phase separation and the granularity associated with it. © 2002 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85038316086&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.66.014503; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=19244375841&origin=inward; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.014503; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.014503/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.014503
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know