Tale of two hard Pomerons
Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, ISSN: 0556-2821, Vol: 62, Issue: 1, Page: 1-20
2000
- 14Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Two mechanisms are examined for hard double "pomeron" exchange dijet production, the factorized model of Ingelman-Schlein, and the nonfactorized model of lossless jet production which exhibits the Collins-Frankfurt-Strikman mechanism. Comparisons between these two mechanisms are made of the total cross section, E spectra, and mean rapidity spectra. For both mechanisms, several specific models are examined with the cuts of the collider detector at Fermilab (CDF), DØ, and representative cuts of CERN LHC. Distinct qualitative differences are predicted by the two mechanisms for the CDF y spectra and for the E spectra for all three experimental cuts. The preliminary CDF and DØ experimental data for this process are interpreted in terms of these two mechanisms. The y spectra of the CDF data are suggestive of domination by the factorized Ingelman-Schlein mechanism, whereas the DØ data show no greater preference for either mechanism. An inconsistency is found among all the theoretical models in attempting to explain the ratio of the cross sections given by the data from these two experiments. ©2000 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=18244405767&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.62.014015; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.014015; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.014015/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.014015
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know