Transport properties of BiSr CaCuO crystals with and without surface barriers
Physical Review Letters, ISSN: 1079-7114, Vol: 81, Issue: 18, Page: 3944-3947
1998
- 48Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
BiSr CaCuO crystals with electrical contacts positioned far from the edges are studied by transport measurements, then cut into narrow strip geometry, and remeasured. Instead of showing larger resistance, the strips display a dramatic drop in the resistance, enhanced activation energy, and nonlinear behavior due to strong surface barriers. The surface barriers also dominate the resistive drop at the first-order phase transition. Because the surface barriers are avoided in large crystals, we are able to probe the solid phase and find good agreement with the recent predictions of Bragg glass theory. © 1998 American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0001082143&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.3944; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3944; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3944/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3944
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know