Extracting grain-orientation-dependent data from in situ time-of-flight neutron diffraction. I. Inverse pole figures
Journal of Applied Crystallography, ISSN: 1600-5767, Vol: 47, Issue: 6, Page: 2019-2029
2014
- 17Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The problem of calculating the inverse pole figure (IPF) is analyzed from the perspective of the application of time-of flight neutron diffraction to in situ monitoring of the thermomechanical behavior of engineering materials. On the basis of a quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) method, a consistent set of grain orientations is generated and used to compute the weighting factors for IPF normalization. The weighting factors are instrument dependent and were calculated for the engineering materials diffractometer VULCAN (Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge National Laboratory). The QMC method is applied to face-centered cubic structures and can be easily extended to other crystallographic symmetries. Examples include 316LN stainless steel in situ loaded in tension at room temperature and an Al-2%Mg alloy, substantially deformed by cold rolling and in situ annealed up to 653 K.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84913552808&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s1600576714023036; http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S1600576714023036; http://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2014/06/00/ks5436/ks5436.pdf; https://journals.iucr.org/paper?S1600576714023036; https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s1600576714023036
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know