Limitations of the kinematic approximation in neutron reflectivity measurements for the analysis of bilayers
Journal of Applied Crystallography, ISSN: 1600-5767, Vol: 51, Issue: 6, Page: 1556-1563
2018
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
The limitations of a phenomenological fitting approach compared to simulations of the optical model including reflection and refraction at all interfaces are demonstrated using the example of hydrogen loading in ultra-thin vanadium layers. Fe/V superlattices are loaded with deuterium and the lattice expansion and deuterium concentration are extracted from neutron reflectivity data. A noticeable difference is found between the extraction of concentrations and bilayer thicknesses directly from the superlattice peaks and fits of the density profile using the Parratt formalism. The results underline the importance of carefully considering the limitations of phenomenological approaches, in order to obtain robust results. The limitations of the kinematic approximation for the analysis are discussed in detail.
Bibliographic Details
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know