Corrigendum: Comparative structure analysis of the ETSi domain of ERG3 and its complex with the E74 promoter DNA sequence (Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications (2018) F74 (656-663) DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X1801110X)
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications, ISSN: 2053-230X, Vol: 75, Issue: Pt 5, Page: 397-398
2019
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Correction Description
An incorrect SDS�PAGE image was added by mistake to Fig. 1 of the article by Sharma et al. (2018). The correct version is published here. (Table Presented).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85065159260&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s2053230x19003376; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31045570; https://journals.iucr.org/paper?S2053230X19003376; https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s2053230x19003376; https://journals.iucr.org/f/issues/2019/05/00/or9009/index.html
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know