Motivation on training transfer: a moderated moderation model of personal capacity for transfer and gender
European Journal of Training and Development, ISSN: 2046-9020, Vol: 49, Issue: 1-2, Page: 260-278
2025
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Purpose: Previous research suggests that motivation to transfer is related to the effective transfer of training, but less is known about the boundary conditions of this relationship. Therefore, this study aims to propose that motivation to transfer is more strongly related to training transfer when employees have a stronger personal capacity for transfer. The author also hypothesizes that this two-way interaction is further moderated by gender. Design/methodology/approach: Using a cross-sectional design and a sample of 257 Tunisian workers, a three-way interaction model with the PROCESS macro (Hayes, 2018) was used to test the hypotheses. Findings: Results show that workers respond to motivation to transfer with increased training transfer. Personal capacity for transfer and gender moderated the proposed relationship. Thus, the interaction effect between motivation to transfer and personal capacity for transfer is significant for women but not significant for men. More specifically, motivation to transfer is more likely to predict training transfer among women with high personal capacity for transfer than among those with low. Originality/value: This study adds to the literature on motivation to transfer and training transfer by explaining two boundary conditions in this relationship and by recognizing the conditional interaction effect of gender on the moderating effect of personal capacity for transfer.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know