Using knowledge discovery through data mining to gain intelligence from routinely collected incident reporting in an acute English hospital
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, ISSN: 0952-6862, Vol: 33, Issue: 2, Page: 221-234
2020
- 8Citations
- 95Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Purpose: Incident reporting systems are commonly deployed in healthcare but resulting datasets are largely warehoused. This study explores if intelligence from such datasets could be used to improve quality, efficiency, and safety. Design/methodology/approach: Incident reporting data recorded in one NHS acute Trust was mined for insight (n = 133,893 April 2005–July 2016 across 201 fields, 26,912,493 items). An a priori dataset was overlaid consisting of staffing, vital signs, and national safety indicators such as falls. Analysis was primarily nonlinear statistical approaches using Mathematica V11. Findings: The organization developed a deeper understanding of the use of incident reporting systems both in terms of usability and possible reflection of culture. Signals emerged which focused areas of improvement or risk. An example of this is a deeper understanding of the timing and staffing levels associated with falls. Insight into the nature and grading of reporting was also gained. Practical implications: Healthcare incident reporting data is underused and with a small amount of analysis can provide real insight and application to patient safety. Originality/value: This study shows that insight can be gained by mining incident reporting datasets, particularly when integrated with other routinely collected data.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079735850&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-08-2018-0209; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32233355; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2018-0209/full/html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-08-2018-0209; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijhcqa-08-2018-0209/full/html
Emerald
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know