Autonomy, motivation, knowledge and individual absorptive capacity as promoters of innovative behavior at work
RAUSP Management Journal, ISSN: 2531-0488, Vol: 59, Issue: 3, Page: 212-228
2024
- 2Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effect of diversity of knowledge and intrinsic motivation on individual absorptive capacity, its effect on innovative behavior at work, as well as the moderating effect of autonomy at work. Design/methodology/approach: Data collection was carried out at the Companhia do Metropolitano de São Paulo – Metrô – obtaining 192 valid questionnaires, which were analyzed using descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling with partial least squares estimation. Findings: Intrinsic motivation and diversity of prior knowledge have a direct effect on individual absorptive capacity (IAC) and an indirect effect on innovative work behavior (IWB). The relationship between IAC and IWB is strengthened as work autonomy increases (moderating effect). Research limitations/implications: The results are not generalizable as this is a nonprobabilistic sample with respondents from the public sector who have job stability. Practical implications: To encourage innovative behavior at work, the organization can implement practices that promote autonomy at work, and consider personal experiences that are not directly related to work during the selection and hiring process. Social implications: By valuing life experience and autonomy at work and promoting innovative behavior at work, a working environment in which people feel good must be created. Originality/value: The main highlights are the operationalization of the diversity of prior knowledge as a three-dimensional construct that promotes IAC, in addition to the moderating effect of autonomy at work.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197465321&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rausp-12-2022-0260; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RAUSP-12-2022-0260/full/html; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2531-04882024000300212&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2531-04882024000300212&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2531-04882024000300212; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2531-04882024000300212; https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rausp-12-2022-0260
Emerald
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know