Leveraging structural information in ontology matching
Proceedings - International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA, ISSN: 1550-445X, Vol: 2016-May, Page: 1108-1115
2016
- 10Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Ontology matching is an important part of enabling the semantic web to reach its full potential. Most existing ontology matching methods are mainly based on linguistic information (label, name, title and comment) but from the results achieved it is realized that this information is not sufficient. The latest ontology matching research works are trying to deeply dig into the structural information of ontologies by using "similarityflooding" method. However, there are several innate issues in similarity-flooding methods that lead to wrong matching results. In this paper, we report the problems of similarity-flooding in ontology matching and propose a novel method to effectively leverage the structural information of the ontology. The evaluation is conducted on OAEI ontology matching benchmarks from 2011 to 2015. The result shows that the proposed approach performs comparatively well with other state of the art matching systems.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know