Automated conformance testing of java virtual machines
Proceedings - 2013 7th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS 2013, Page: 547-552
2013
- 18Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
We present a technique to fully automate the conformance testing of a Java virtual machine (JVM) implementation to the structural constraints it must satisfy to enforce type safety of program execution. The approach is based on formal modeling of the JVM as a finite state machine, ruled by the Java standard specifications. The model is used to derive a test suite and corresponding oracle that systematically explores the space of illegal states reachable by a JVM implementation under test. Also, a degree of conformance to the JVM specifications (i.e., too strict or too coarse) can be assessed by counting the number of false positives. Despite the huge test space, the entire proposed process need not human supervision. The technique is black box, fully automated, and can be applied for validating final products or during development i.e. for debugging purposes. © 2013 IEEE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84885198103&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cisis.2013.99; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6603948; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/6603428/6603811/06603948.pdf?arnumber=6603948; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6603948; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6603948/
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know