HATE: A HArdware Trojan Emulation Environment for Microprocessor-based Systems
2019 IEEE 25th International Symposium on On-Line Testing and Robust System Design, IOLTS 2019, Page: 109-114
2019
- 2Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The constant quest of low production cost and short time-to-market, together with the growing complexity of integrated circuits led to the globalization of the supply chain of silicon devices. One of the threats related to such a supply chain are Hardware Trojan Horses (HWTs), that, in the last years, became a serious issue not only for academy but also for industry. Although a large number of methodologies for HWTs prevention, detection and tolerance have been proposed, there is a lack of well-recognized methods and metrics to evaluate their effectiveness. In this paper we present HATE , a HArdware Trojan Emulation Environment. The goal of HATE is twofold: (i) the tool can be used to analyse whether a given HWT (or a given set of HWTs) is activated by a software running on a microprocessor, and (ii) it can be used to assess HWTs detection techniques in microprocessors against a set of generated HWTs (either randomly or not). HATE represents, in our vision, a step towards the definition of a reference benchmarking scenario, to provide a comparative ground for evaluating different proposals focusing on HWT detection/tolerance. A subset of MiBench programs have been used to analyse the efficiency of HATE.HATE is freely available at http://cassano.faculty.polimi.it/
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know