Analysis of phase-detection algorithms for back-EMF-based sensorless strategies through real-time simulations
SLED 2011 - 2nd 2011 Symposium on Sensorless Control for Electrical Drives, Page: 129-137
2011
- 9Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The work developed in this paper presents a comparison between three different phase detection algorithms in order to study the benefits of using each of them when they are applied inside a sensorless rotor position estimation technique. In particular we will analyse the various aspects related to the use of each single algorithm when it is applied into a specific model-based sensorless strategy and when we also take into account the typical impairments affecting the implementation of the real setup, such as unwanted harmonic components and measurement offsets. As a first step a short overview on each phase-detection algorithm under consideration will be given and subsequently the proposed model-based estimation technique will be presented. As a second step the three algorithms are analyzed in detail highlighting their dynamical performances and their robustness properties against implementative knots, in particular through the use of software simulations and real-time simulations reproducing the specific test case of a five-phase motor. © 2011 IEEE.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know