Learning through Formula Student Electric: Students and Staff Perspectives
TALE 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education, Proceedings, Page: 241-247
2021
- 2Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Formula Student is a competition held for students from different universities that mimic real-world performance motorsport racing such as Formula One. This study presents the perceptions of students and staff on the Formula Student Electric China (FSEC) team initiative in a Sino-foreign higher education institution in China. The literature showed that the FSEC and similar competitions aligned to the Problem Based Learning paradigm seek to broaden the students' knowledge and abilities. The study had explored the views and opinions of those involved, focusing on the benefits to the teaching and learning process. The qualitative paradigm was selected for this study of the process as it mainly focused on the human aspect, such as ideas, thoughts, feelings, and personal opinions about the FSEC. Data was collected through interviews with the students and staff, through process observations of the activities and a review of related activities documents and literature. A total of five key themes outlining the benefits of FSEC for students' learning and student experience were identified through thematic analysis. The Formula Student project creates an environment where the students are highly motivated to seek their knowledge through active learning and proactively engaged with their peers and related stakeholders, thus benefiting them with a rewarding educational experience. The findings will benefit future endeavors in planning for competition involvement and ensuring students' learning is also achieved as part of their university life experience.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know