Classification of the excitation location of snore sounds in the upper airway by acoustic multifeature analysis
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, ISSN: 1558-2531, Vol: 64, Issue: 8, Page: 1731-1741
2017
- 65Citations
- 118Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations65
- Citation Indexes64
- 64
- CrossRef54
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Captures118
- Readers118
- 117
Article Description
Objective: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a serious chronic disease and a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Snoring is a typical symptom of OSA patients. Knowledge of the origin of obstruction and vibration within the upper airways is essential for a targeted surgical approach. Aim of this paper is to systematically compare different acoustic features, and classifiers for their performance in the classification of the excitation location of snore sounds. Methods: Snore sounds from 40 male patients have been recorded during drug-induced sleep endoscopy, and categorized by Ear, Nose & Throat (ENT) experts. Crest Factor, fundamental frequency, spectral frequency features, subband energy ratio, mel-scale frequency cepstral coefficients, empirical mode decomposition-based features, and wavelet energy features have been extracted and fed into several classifiers. Using the ReliefF algorithm, features have been ranked and the selected feature subsets have been tested with the same classifiers. Results: A fusion of all features after a ReliefF feature selection step in combination with a random forests classifier showed the best classification results of 78% unweighted average recall by subject independent validation. Conclusion: Multifeature analysis is a promising means to help identify the anatomical mechanisms of snore sound generation in individual subjects. Significance: This paper describes a novel ap- proach for the machine-based multifeature classification of the excitation location of snore sounds in the upper airway.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029225278&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2016.2619675; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28113249; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7605472/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/10/7981410/07605472.pdf?arnumber=7605472
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know