A Physiology-based Driver Readiness Estimation Model for Tuning ISO 26262 Controllability
IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, ISSN: 1550-2252, Vol: 2020-May, Page: 1-5
2020
- 4Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
When a hazardous situation approaches, the semi-autonomous vehicle opts for the driver as a fallback solution, unaware of the driver's readiness. During such a situation, autonomy misuse can occur when a driver becomes over-reliant on autonomous driving. For handling the hazardous event, controllability is paramount. We postulate that semi-autonomous vehicles decline their consideration in understanding the drivers' focus on the vehicle and the road. To examine the drivers' focus on the vehicle and the road we uphold that the vehicle must initiate exploring the drivers' situation awareness for the readiness, which could feasibly tune the ISO 26262 controllability. In this paper, we propose a physiology-based driver situation awareness for the readiness model through the driver's stress and drowsiness estimation. In addition, we boost the situation awareness for the readiness of the driver by enabling frequent interaction between the driver and the vehicle managing system.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know