Cognitive-agent-based modeling of a financial market
Proceedings - 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2009, Vol: 2, Page: 20-27
2009
- 5Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
This paper describes our experience in building an evolutionary system for agent-based modeling of a financial market. The system uses a type of BDI agents, which are deliberative agents with a mental state defined by a belief base and by a set of desire-generation rules. Beliefs are graded and trust in information sources is taken into account. At any moment, an agent generates a set of desires and selects a consistent subset thereof, whose elements are adopted as goals, to be achieved by executing actions. The market structure is realistic, albeit simplified: a single asset is assumed to exist, that is traded on the market in indistinguishable, standardized contracts against payment of money. The price of trades is continuously determined by means of a single-price auction, which crosses buy and sell orders to maximize market liquidity. Every agent has, at any moment, an available amount of money and an inventory of asset contracts, which, valued at market price and added to the available money, yields the agent's net asset value (NAV). To determine their economical behavior, the agents have access to a set of technical indicators made available by the market, which constitute the sources of their beliefs, and to their current balance, which constitutes their knowledge. The agents participating in the market evolve by means of an evolutionary algorithm: they undergo selection based on their NAV, replication with random mutations, and recombination. When an agent replicates, its properties are divided among the offspring. This evolutionary process favors the reproduction of profitable traders, allowing the emergence of "sensible" behaviors. The market thus simulated has been analyzed both in quantitative and in qualitative terms. The analysis has demonstrated that the model exhibits several traits that are typical of real-world financial markets. © 2009 IEEE.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know