Systematic Literature Review: Machine Learning Prediction Model for Covid-19 Spreading
2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System, ICORIS 2022, Page: 1-5
2022
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Conference Paper Description
The dataset, methods, and machine learning prediction framework on the Covid-19 theme have been published widely and complex. Special publications on the spread of virus infection 19 in the form of a time series need to be mapped more comprehensively. This literature review aims to identify and analyze research trends, datasets, and methods used in predicting Covid-19 with Machine Learning Engineering research between 2019 and 2021. Identifying the need, specifying the research question evaluating review protocol, searching for papers, scanning papers, and reporting results are the eight major steps of this systematic literature review. The most critical aspect of systematic analysis is defining the research questions. The PICOC techniques are used to identify research questions. Journal candidates were filtered out using inclusion and exclusion criteria techniques to shrink the SLR scope area. based on a literature study it was found that research in 2019-2021 on the Covid-19 distribution prediction system used variables: susceptibility, infection, mortality, geography, weather, and patient clinical data to be processed into ANFIS machine learning prediction models and neural networks are several models. A classification model that is widely used for hybrid processing in calculating covid-19 infection prediction. The datasets that are often used do not fully meet the epidemiological aspects that trigger the spread of COVID-19 infections. ANFIS and NN are several classification methods that are widely used for hybrid processing in calculating predictions of the spread of COVID-19 infection.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know