Assessment of Medical Record Management in Hospital: A Comprehensive Study on Awareness, Challenges and Systems
2024 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, ISEC 2024, Page: 1-8
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
Background: Previous research papers suggest that effective hospital medical record management requires the health professional to handle clinical records efficiently and proficiently. However, there needs to be more data in this domain. Method: There were primarily three significant sections of this structured questionnaire. The first gauged the knowledge of interviewees on the main subject. The second focuses on the impact of electronic medical records on overall patient care and treatment. Lastly, discuss any issues complying with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) protocols and data management regulations. Findings: 48.7% of the participants must be aware of the medical record management software utilised in Symbiosis University Hospital & Research Centre (SUHRC). Only about 26.5% of the research population feel that the current recording system is efficient and impacting their workflow and patient management. 71.2% of participants were well aware of the challenges in handling and accessing medical records, and 75% of respondents reported being aware of the protocols and practices used for health data security and confidentiality. 63.9% of the sample population believe the EMR system is updated regularly. Interpretation: This number indicates several improvements can be made in current systems. Conclusion: Therefore, healthcare compliance practices help enhance systems that manage medical records, eventually improving patient data security and improving patient care quality.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know