Unimanual Versus Bimanual Motor Imagery Classifiers for Assistive and Rehabilitative Brain Computer Interfaces
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, ISSN: 1534-4320, Vol: 26, Issue: 12, Page: 2407-2415
2018
- 26Citations
- 78Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef19
- Captures78
- Readers78
- 78
Article Description
Bimanual movements are an integral part of everyday activities and are often included in rehabilitation therapies. Yet, electroencephalography (EEG)-based assistive and rehabilitative brain-computer interface (BCI) systems typically rely on motor imagination (MI) of one limb at the time. In this paper, we present a classifier which discriminates between uni-And bi-manual MI. Ten able-bodied participants took part in cue-based motor execution (ME) and MI tasks of the left (L), right (R) and both (B) hands. A 32-channel EEG was recorded. Three linear discriminant analysis classifiers, based on MI of L-B, B-R, and B-L hands were created, with features based on wide band common spatial patterns (CSP) 8-30 Hz, and band specifics common spatial patterns (CSPb). Event-related desynchronization (ERD) was significantly stronger during bimanual compared to unimanual ME on both hemispheres. Bimanual MI resulted in bilateral parietally shifted ERD of similar intensity to unimanual MI. The average classification accuracy for CSP and CSPb was comparable for the L-R task (73% ± 9% and 75% ± 10%, respectively) and for the L-B task (73% ± 11% and 70% ± 9%, respectively). However, for the R-B task (67% ± 3% and 72% ± 6%, respectively), it was significantly higher for CSPb ( p = 0.0351 ). Six participants whose L-R classification accuracy exceeded 70% were included in an online task a week later, using the unmodified offline CSPb classifier, achieving 69% ± 3% and 66% ± 3% accuracy for L-R and R-B tasks, respectively. Combined uni-and bi-manual BCI could be used for restoration of motor function of highly disabled patents and for motor rehabilitation of patients with motor deficits.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know