Detecting replicated nodes in Wireless Sensor Networks using random walks and network division
IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC, ISSN: 1525-3511, Page: 2623-2628
2016
- 14Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Wireless Sensor Networks are vulnerable to node replication attacks due to deployment in unattended environments and the lack of physical tamper-resistance. An adversary can easily capture and compromise sensor nodes and after replicating them, he inserts arbitrary number of replicas into the network to mount a wide variety of internal attacks. In this paper we propose a novel distributed solution (RAND) for the detection of node replication attack in static WSNs which combines random walks with network division and works in two phases. In the first phase called network configuration phase, the entire network is divided into different areas. In the second phase called replica detection phase, the clone is detected by following a claimer-reporter-witness framework and a random walk is employed within each area for the selection of witness nodes. Simulation results show that our scheme outperforms the existing witness node based strategies with moderate communication and memory overhead.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know