Comparison of key performance metrics of ensemble learning algorithms for diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy
Proceedings of the World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability, WS4 2020, Page: 362-370
2020
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Around the world, Blindness in diabetic patients are seen commonly because of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR). Sadly, the suggested annual testing of the diabetic patients' eye fundus is too complicated or not a regular manner. It is needed to provide information for the doctors about critical patients who would need regular checkup and others who can be considered as low risk and can be screened after considerable time. This paper explores various performance factors from most popular and leading ensemble algorithms that play key role in classifying and grading diabetic retinopathy. Three ensemble algorithms most widely used in Medical-IT industry used for comparison here are Stacking algorithm, AdaBoost algorithm and XGBoost ensemble classifier. The experiment demonstrates how various performance factors used to compare each classifier helps in deciding about the kind of dataset to be used and also for selecting the attributes. This demonstration uses a reduced set of attributes obtained thru correlation based feature extraction (CFS) method in comparison with original dataset with all characteristics that constitute significant risk factors for deciding whether a patients who are at high risk of diabetic retinopathy. Comparison of specificity and sensitivity levels gained are provided for a deeper comprehension of the behaviors of different ensemble algorithms. This research is therefore a first productive step towards developing a customized system helping in making a good decision.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know