PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Criminal justice outcomes over 5 years after randomization to buprenorphine-naloxone or methadone treatment for opioid use disorder

Addiction, ISSN: 1360-0443, Vol: 114, Issue: 8, Page: 1396-1404
2019
  • 47
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 102
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    47
  • Captures
    102
  • Mentions
    2
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1

Most Recent Blog

Neil O’Brien: Challenges for the new Prime Minister – law and order. Punishment needs to be swift and certain after crime.

Neil O’Brien was until recently a Minister at the Department of Levelling up. He is MP for Harborough. The cost of living and the health

Most Recent News

Study finds treatment with medication reduces arrests and incarceration among people with opioid use disorder

When it comes to addressing the national opioid crisis, most of the research has focused on the physical health risks faced by people with opioid use disorder, such as overdose and infectious disease. For the first time, a University of Massachusetts Amherst public health scientist studied the impact of treating opioid use disorder on the risk for arrest and incarceration, comparing the effects of

Article Description

Aims: To compare long-term criminal justice outcomes among opioid-dependent individuals randomized to receive buprenorphine or methadone. Design, setting and participants: A 5-year follow-up was conducted in 2011–14 of 303 opioid-dependent participants entering three opioid treatment programs in California, USA in 2006–09 and randomized to receive either buprenorphine/naloxone or methadone. Intervention and comparator: Participants received buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP; n = 179) or methadone (MET; n = 124) for 24 weeks and then were tapered off their treatment over ≤ 8 weeks or referred for ongoing clinical treatment. Midway through the study, the randomization scheme was switched from 1 : 1 BUP : MET to 2 : 1 because of higher dropout in the BUP arm. Measurements: Study outcomes included arrests and self-reported incarceration. Predictors included randomization condition (buprenorphine versus methadone), age, gender, race/ethnicity, use of cocaine, drug injection in the 30 days prior to baseline and study site. Treatment status (buprenorphine, methadone, none) during follow-up was included as a time-varying covariate. Findings: There was no significant difference by randomization condition in the proportion arrested (buprenorphine: 55.3%, methadone: 54.0%) or incarcerated (40.9%, 47.3%) during follow-up. Among methadone-randomized individuals, arrest was less likely with methadone treatment (0.50, 0.35–0.72) during follow-up (relative to no treatment) and switching to buprenorphine had a lower likelihood of arrest than those receiving no treatment (0.39, 0.18–0.87). Among buprenorphine-randomized individuals, arrest was less likely with receipt of buprenorphine (0.49, 0.33–0.75) during follow-up and switching to methadone had a similar likelihood of arrest as methadone-randomized individuals receiving no treatment. Likelihood of arrest was also negatively associated with older age (0.98, 0.96–1.00); it was positively associated with Hispanic ethnicity (1.63, 1.04–2.56), cocaine use (2.00, 1.33–3.03), injection drug use (2.19, 1.26–3.83), and study site. Conclusions: In a US sample of people treated for opioid use disorder, continued treatment with either buprenorphine or methadone was associated with a reduction in arrests relative to no treatment. Cocaine use, injection drug use, Hispanic ethnicity and younger age were associated with higher likelihood of arrest.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know