PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The impact of donor and recipient common clinical and genetic variation on estimated glomerular filtration rate in a European renal transplant population

American Journal of Transplantation, ISSN: 1600-6135, Vol: 19, Issue: 8, Page: 2262-2273
2019
  • 14
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 42
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Genetic variation across the human leukocyte antigen loci is known to influence renal-transplant outcome. However, the impact of genetic variation beyond the human leukocyte antigen loci is less clear. We tested the association of common genetic variation and clinical characteristics, from both the donor and recipient, with posttransplant eGFR at different time-points, out to 5 years posttransplantation. We conducted GWAS meta-analyses across 10 844 donors and recipients from five European ancestry cohorts. We also analyzed the impact of polygenic risk scores (PRS), calculated using genetic variants associated with nontransplant eGFR, on posttransplant eGFR. PRS calculated using the recipient genotype alone, as well as combined donor and recipient genotypes were significantly associated with eGFR at 1-year posttransplant. Thirty-two percent of the variability in eGFR at 1-year posttransplant was explained by our model containing clinical covariates (including weights for death/graft-failure), principal components and combined donor-recipient PRS, with 0.3% contributed by the PRS. No individual genetic variant was significantly associated with eGFR posttransplant in the GWAS. This is the first study to examine PRS, composed of variants that impact kidney function in the general population, in a posttransplant context. Despite PRS being a significant predictor of eGFR posttransplant, the effect size of common genetic factors is limited compared to clinical variables.

Bibliographic Details

Caragh P. Stapleton; Gianpiero L. Cavalleri; Andreas Heinzel; Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer; Rainer Oberbauer; Weihua Guan; Peter J. van der Most; Harold Snieder; Jessica van Setten; Graham M. Lord; Florence Delaney; Maria P. Hernandez-Fuentes; Brendan J. Keating; Ajay K. Israni; Martin H. de Borst; Stephan J.L. Bakker; Michael E. Weale; Pamala A. Jacobson; William S. Oetting; Patrick B. Mark; Fiona A. Chapman; Alan Jardine; Jamie P. Traynor; Paul J. Phelan; Peter J. Conlon; Claire Kennedy; Donal Sexton; Susan Murray; Amy Jayne McKnight; Alexander P. Maxwell; Laura J. Smyth; Arthur J. Matas; Roslyn B. Mannon; David P. Schladt; David N. Iklé; Christopher Franklin; Irene Rebollo-Mesa; Jennifer Mollon; Esperanza Perucha; Richard Borrows; Catherine Byrne; Brendan Clarke; Menna Clatworthy; John Feehally; Susan Fuggle; Sarah A. Gagliano; Sian Griffin; Abdul Hammad; Robert Higgins; Mary Keogan; Timothy Leach; Iain MacPhee; James Marsh; Peter Maxwell; William McKane; Adam McLean; Charles Newstead; Titus Augustine; Steve Powis; Peter Rowe; Neil Sheerin; Ellen Solomon; Henry Stephens; Raj Thuraisingham; Richard Trembath; Peter Topham; Robert Vaughan; Steven H. Sacks; Gerhard Opelz; Nicole Soranzo; J. Michael Cecka; John Connett; Fernando G. Cosio; Robert Gaston; Sita Gourishankar; Joseph P. Grande; Lawrence Hunsicker; Bertram Kasiske; David Rush

Elsevier BV

Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know