Loss of normal anagen hair in pemphigus vulgaris
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, ISSN: 1365-2230, Vol: 40, Issue: 5, Page: 485-488
2015
- 14Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef9
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
Background Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a known cause of loss of 'normal' anagen hair; that is, shedding of intact anagen hairs covered by root sheaths. However, studies on this subject are limited. Aim To investigate anagen hair shedding in patients with PV, and ascertain its association with disease severity. Methods In total, 96 consecutive patients with PV (new patients or patients in relapse) who were admitted to the dermatology wards of a tertiary hospital were enrolled in this study. Demographic data, PV phenotype, disease severity and presence of scalp lesions were recorded. A group of 10-20 hairs were pulled gently from different areas of the scalp (lesional and nonlesional skin) in all patients, and anagen hairs were counted. Disease severity was graded according to Harman score. Results Anagen hair was obtained by pull test in 59 of the 96 patients (61.5%), of whom 2 had normal scalp. The mean ± SD anagen hair count was 5.9 ± 7.6 (range 0-31). In univariate analysis, anagen hair loss (P < 0.01) and the presence of scalp lesions (P = 0.01) were associated with severe disease. Mean anagen hair count was significantly higher in the severe (mean 6.83 ± 7.89) than the moderate (mean 1.06 ± 1.94) subgroup (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed anagen hair loss (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05-1.28, P < 0.01), but not scalp lesions (P = 0.69) as an independent predictor of disease severity. Conclusions According to our study, normal anagen effluvium is a frequent finding in patients with PV, and interestingly, this was observed in nonlesional as well as lesional scalp. In addition, severe anagen hair loss was an independent predictor of the disease severity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84931955025&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.12595; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25689629; https://academic.oup.com/ced/article/40/5/485/6621390; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.12595; https://academic.oup.com/ced/article-abstract/40/5/485/6621390?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know