PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation

Conservation Science and Practice, ISSN: 2578-4854, Vol: 2, Issue: 8
2020
  • 63
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 295
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 75
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    63
    • Citation Indexes
      61
    • Policy Citations
      2
      • 2
  • Captures
    295
  • Social Media
    75
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      75
      • Facebook
        75

Review Description

Camera traps (CTs) are an increasingly popular method of studying animal behavior. However, the impact of cameras on detected individuals—such as from mechanical noise, odor, and emitted light—has received relatively little attention. These impacts are particularly important in behavioral studies in conservation that seek to ascribe changes in behavior to relevant environmental factors. In this article, we discuss three sources of bias that are relevant to conservation behavior studies using CTs: (a) disturbance caused by cameras; (b) variation in animal-detection parameters across camera models; and (c) biased detection across individuals and age, sex, and behavioral classes. We propose several recommendations aimed at mitigating responses to CTs by wildlife. Our recommendations offer a platform for the development of more rigorous and robust behavioral studies using CT technology and, if adopted, would result in greater applied benefits for conservation and management.

Bibliographic Details

Anthony Caravaggi; Amelia Grass; A. Cole Burton; Douglas A. Clark; Jason T. Fisher; Sian Green; Catherine Hobaiter; Tim R. Hofmeester; Ammie K. Kalan; Daniella Rabaiotti; Danielle Rivet

Wiley

Environmental Science

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know