Computed tomography attenuation and patient characteristics as predictors of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy
HPB, ISSN: 1365-182X, Vol: 15, Issue: 9, Page: 709-715
2013
- 26Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef18
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains high. Computed tomography (CT) of intra‐abdominal tissue has not been thoroughly evaluated to establish associations with the occurrence of complications after PD. The current study sought to determine whether differences in non‐enhanced visceral attenuation predicted complications after PD. Outcomes in patients undergoing PD were analysed according to the Clavien system for classifying complications and the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula system for classifying postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Preoperative non‐enhanced CT scans were evaluated by a blinded investigator for attenuation of abdominal viscera and fat thickness. Data on pancreatic firmness and pancreatic duct size were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 134 patients underwent PD for malignant and benign disease. Rates of morbidity, mortality and POPF at 90 days were 61%, 4% and 23%, respectively. Patients with a body mass index of > 25 kg/m 2 had higher rates of POPF ( P = 0.05) and complications ( P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, patients were more likely to develop any complication as CT attenuation decreased for paraspinus muscle ( P < 0.01), spleen ( P < 0.03) and liver ( P = 0.01) parenchyma. Postoperative complications after PD remain prevalent. Decreased CT attenuation of abdominal viscera is an independent predictor of morbidity after PD and suggests a high‐risk patient physiology for pancreatic resection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X1531460X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12037; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84882448446&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23458275; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1365182X1531460X; http://www.hpbonline.org/article/S1365-182X(15)31460-X/abstract; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/getSharedSiteSession?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hpbonline.org%2Farticle%2FS1365-182X%2815%2931460-X%2Fabstract&rc=0&code=hpb-site; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.hpbonline.org%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa7TxLouCm4g-X_kmKxv%2526MAID%253Dndcm7yCQfdCuoIcAtieLwQ%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLGvmNGtLlDx7g%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D467619027%2526RD%253DRD; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.hpbonline.org%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa7TxLouCm4g-X_kmKxv%2526MAID%253Dndcm7yCQfdCuoIcAtieLwQ%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLGvmNGtLlDx7g%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D467619027%2526RD%253DRD; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/consumeSsoCookie?redirectUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hpbonline.org%2Faction%2FconsumeSharedSessionAction%3FJSESSIONID%3Daaa7TxLouCm4g-X_kmKxv%26MAID%3Dndcm7yCQfdCuoIcAtieLwQ%253D%253D%26SERVER%3DWZ6myaEXBLGvmNGtLlDx7g%253D%253D%26ORIGIN%3D467619027%26RD%3DRD&acw=&utt=; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hpb.12037/abstract; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hpb.12037; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hpb.12037; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/hpb.12037; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/hpb.12037; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1365182X1531460X
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know