Purging iron from the heart
British Journal of Haematology, ISSN: 0007-1048, Vol: 125, Issue: 5, Page: 545-551
2004
- 40Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations40
- Citation Indexes39
- 39
- CrossRef26
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 23
Review Description
Methods are now available to measure the magnitude of iron accumulation in the heart. Their validation currently relies on indirect evidence and not on chemical estimation in cardiac biopsies. All patients with symptomatic heart disease appear to have abnormal T2* values, but many patients without symptomatic heart disease also have evidence of increased myocardial iron. Although there is no proof to date that increased myocardial iron, as evidenced by abnormal magnetic resonance imaging, carries an adverse prognosis, it is likely that such new information will affect the chelating programme of patients. In these cases, there are a number of options available: (i) ongoing treatment with either desferrioxamine (DFO) or deferiprone may be intensified; (ii) the patient may be switched to the alternative chelator or (iii) combined chelation with both DFO and deferiprone may be started, which is more effective than using either chelator alone. For patients with symptomatic heart disease, continuous intravenous DFO with, or without deferiprone, remains the currently recommended treatment, in view of its documented ability to salvage these patients.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know