Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme
Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN: 0962-1067, Vol: 16, Issue: 7, Page: 1270-1277
2007
- 25Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef21
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
Aim and objectives. Primary: to study the level of agreement among nurses and doctors in classifying the colour and exudation of open wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme. Secondary: to check their agreement with an international expert panel on whether their classification was correct. Background. Nurses and doctors classify open wounds to assess systemic and local treatment options. Nowadays, several classification schemes are being used. The Red-Yellow-Black-scheme is commonly used for classifying open wounds or is part of other, more intricate, wound classification models. Methods. Eighteen representative photographs of red, yellow and black wounds were presented to 63 nurses and 79 doctors from the Department of Surgery. They classified these open wounds for colour and amount of exudation. Group kappa's (κ) were calculated to assess inter- and intra-observer agreement and their agreement with an expert panel. Results. Agreement among the 63 nurses on wound colour (κ = 0·61; 95% CI: 0·49-0·74) and exudation (κ = 0·49; 95% CI: 0·29-0·68) was moderate to good. Agreement among the 79 doctors was similar: κ = 0·61; 95% CI 0·49-0·73 for wound colour and κ = 0·48; 95% CI: 0·36-0·61 for exudation. Nurses' and doctors' agreement with the expert panel was also moderate to good: κ-values ranged between 0·48 and 0·77. Conclusion. Based on the good to moderate inter-observer agreement as found in this study, the Red-Yellow-Black -scheme appears to be a reliable and accurate classification scheme to assess open (surgical) wounds. Such a scheme may enable nurses and doctors to select the appropriate treatment modalities and evaluate the progress of the healing process. Relevance to clinical practice. The Red-Yellow-Black scheme is a helpful tool to classify all kinds of wounds and can be used as stand-alone classification method or as part of wound management concepts. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34250650197&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01789.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17584345; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01789.x; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01789.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01789.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know