Leadership Cycles in a Quality-Ladder Model of Endogenous Growth
Economic Journal, ISSN: 0013-0133, Vol: 122, Issue: 561, Page: 618-650
2012
- 19Citations
- 333Usage
- 27Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We study a quality-ladder model of endogenous growth that produces stochastic leadership cycles. Over a cycle, industry leaders can innovate several successive times in the same sector before being replaced by a new entrant. Initially, new leaders do much of the research but they then tend to rest on their laurels and are eventually overtaken. The model generates a skewed firm size distribution and a deviation from Gibrat's law that accord with the empirical evidence. We also find conditions under which policy should favour R&D by incumbents, not outsiders, and show that stronger patent protection may reduce innovation and growth. © 2012 Royal Economic Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84861712279&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02510.x; https://academic.oup.com/ej/article/122/561/618-650/5079755; http://academic.oup.com/ej/article-pdf/122/561/618/26068411/ej0618.pdf; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1468-0297.2012.02510.x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02510.x; https://academic.oup.com/ej/article-abstract/122/561/618/5079755?redirectedFrom=fulltext; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2073108; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2073108
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know