Impact of antibiotic restrictions: the physician's perspective
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, ISSN: 1198-743X, Vol: 12, Issue: SUPPL. 5, Page: 3-9
2006
- 8Citations
- 55Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef7
- Captures55
- Readers55
- 55
Review Description
In recent years, there have been worldwide efforts to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. This has mainly been in response to mounting concerns about the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Surprisingly, there has been little systematic investigation of the impact of antibiotic restrictions on the complications of infection. It is difficult to address this question using randomised clinical trials in light of the often limited numbers of patients that can be included, who are also often atypical of the broad population of patients receiving antibiotic therapy. Observational data from the UK indicate an association between recent reductions in antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infection in general practice and an increase in pneumonia mortality. These studies suggest a need for further investigations examining the changing patterns of antibiotic prescribing and their effects on patient outcomes in other countries and in other common infectious diseases. Such studies may provide a useful comparison with the changes observed in lower respiratory tract infection in the UK, and could help to improve antibiotic prescribing practices worldwide. It is also important to study whether associated worse outcomes are limited to certain at-risk groups who should be targeted for care.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X14613276; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01525.x; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33745276516&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16827819; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1198743X14613276; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01525.x
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know