Mastoparan‐induced phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis by phospholipase D activation in human astrocytoma cells
British Journal of Pharmacology, ISSN: 1476-5381, Vol: 116, Issue: 3, Page: 2090-2096
1995
- 24Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef18
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
The effect of mastoparan on phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis was examined in 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells. Mastoparan (3–30 μm) caused an accumulation of diacylglycerol (DG) and phosphatidic acid (PA) accompanied by choline release in a concentration‐ and time‐dependent manner. In the presence of 2% n‐butanol, mastoparan (3–100 μM) induced phosphatidylbutanol (PBut) accumulation in a concentration‐ and time‐dependent manner, suggesting that mastoparan activates phospholipase D (PLD). Propranolol (30–300 μM), a phosphatidate phosphohydrolase inhibitor, inhibited DG accumulation induced by mastoparan, supporting this idea. Depletion of extracellular free calcium ion did not alter the effect of mastoparan on PLD activity. A protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, calphostin C (1 μm), did not inhibit mastoparan‐induced PLD activation but the ability of mastoparan to stimulate phospholipase D activity was decreased in the PKC down regulated cells. PLD activity stimulated by mastoparan was not prevented by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin (PT) or C3 ADP‐ribosyltransferase. Furthermore, guanine nucleotides did not affect PLD activity stimulation by mastoparan in membrane preparations. Mastoparan stimulated PLD in several cell lines such as RBL‐2H3, RBL‐1, HL‐60, P388, endothelial cells, as well as 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells. These results suggest that mastoparan induces phosphatidylcholine (PC) hydrolysis by activation of PLD, not by activation of phosphatidylcholine‐specific phospholipase C (PC‐PLC); mastoparan‐induced PLD activation is not mediated by G proteins. 1995 British Pharmacological Society
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029143313&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16416.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8640350; https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16416.x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16416.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know