Perioperative outcomes after total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with fast-track open hysterectomy - A retrospective case-control study
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ISSN: 0004-8666, Vol: 51, Issue: 5, Page: 393-396
2011
- 16Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef10
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
Aims: To examine perioperative outcomes after total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with fast-track open hysterectomy using a retrospective case-control study. Methods: Consecutive cases of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) carried out by a single surgeon were matched with cases of fast-track open hysterectomy (FTOH) carried out by a second surgeon. Women were matched for age, body mass index, European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, benign or malignant disease and extent of surgery. Results: Fifty women were included in each group; women undergoing TLH had a shorter hospital inpatient length of stay (LOS) (1.82 vs 2.62 days, P = 0.02), but longer total theatre time (TT) and surgical time (ST) (226 vs 182 min, P = 0.05; 172 vs 137 min, P = 0.04). LOS, TT and OT were shorter in the second 25 women undergoing TLH than the first 25 cases (1.8 days vs 2.6 days (P = 0.02); 137 min vs 173 min (P = 0.04); 200 min vs 226 min (P = 0.05). A comparison of the second 25 women undergoing TLH with the matched cohort undergoing FTOH revealed a shorter LOS, but no difference in TT or ST (1.8 days vs 3.4 days (P < 0.001); 175 min vs 200 min (P = 0.33); 137 min vs 144 min (P = 0.48)). There were no readmissions in the TLH group and two in the FTOH group, one for a wound infection and another for a small bowel obstruction. Conclusion: A TLH results in significantly shorter inpatient stay than FTOH and after an initial learning curve does not result in prolonged theatre or surgical times. © 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80054040665&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.2011.01340.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810085; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01340.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1479-828X.2011.01340.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01340.x
Wiley-Blackwell
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know