Survival differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis among “large” ESRD patients in the United States
Kidney International, ISSN: 0085-2538, Vol: 65, Issue: 6, Page: 2398-2408
2004
- 102Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations102
- Citation Indexes102
- 102
- CrossRef88
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Survival differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis among “large” ESRD patients in the United States. It has been hypothesized that peritoneal dialysis compared to hemodialysis may be less effective in large patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We tested this hypothesis in a cohort of 134,728 new ESRD patients who were initiated on dialysis from May 1, 1995 to July 31, 1997 using data from United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Cox regression models evaluated the association of body mass index (BMI) in quintiles (8.8–20.9, 20.9–23.5, 23.5–26.1, 26.1–30.0, 30.0–75.2 kg/m 2 ) with mortality over 2 years in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients separately, while time-dependent models evaluated the relative risk (RR) of death by modality for each BMI quintile. For hemodialysis, the adjusted RR of death was greatest for patients with BMI ≤ 20.9 (RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.32–1.50 for diabetics and RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.21–1.34 for nondiabetics) and lowest for patients with BMI >30.0 (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96–0.99 for diabetic and RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.98 for nondiabetic patients) compared with the referent (23.5–26.1; RR = 1.00). For peritoneal dialysis, the RR of death was also higher for patients with a BMI <20.9 (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.00–1.43 for diabetic and RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.19–1.64 for nondiabetic patients) but no survival advantage was associated with higher BMI values. The RR of death (peritoneal dialysis/hemodialysis) for each BMI quintile was 0.99, 1.12, 1.26 ( P < 0.01), 1.15 ( P < 0.01), and 1.44 ( P < 0.0001) for diabetic and were 1.07, 1.01, 0.96, 1.04, and 1.22 ( P < 0.01) for nondiabetic patients, respectively. We conclude that body size modifies the impact of dialysis modality on mortality risk among new ESRD patients in the United States. The selection of hemodialysis over peritoneal dialysiss was associated with a survival advantage in patients with large body habitus.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085253815499855; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00654.x; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=2442651315&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15149353; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0085253815499855; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00654.x
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know