Simple coagulation tests improve survival prediction in patients with septic shock
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, ISSN: 1538-7836, Vol: 6, Issue: 4, Page: 645-653
2008
- 27Citations
- 47Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations27
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef21
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures47
- Readers47
- 47
Article Description
Background: Classic mortality prediction models in intensive care units (ICUs) are based on clinical scores, which do not contain any coagulation test (SAPS‐II or SOFA scores). Objectives: To determine whether coagulation tests can improve mortality prediction in patients with septic shock. Patients and methods: One hundred fifty‐eight consecutive patients with septic shock entering our institution’s ICU were investigated on the first day of admission, and deaths were registered during the first month. Results: Among all the coagulation tests performed, only the fibrinogen (Fg) plasma level, together with the SAPS‐II score and the age, were included in our simplified mortality score [area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) 0.927, standard deviation (SD) 0.030], which was more efficient than SAPS‐II and SOFA scores themselves in predicting first‐week mortality, its optimized cut‐off having a very high negative predictive value (NPV) [0.989; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.967–1.000)]. A simplified score predicting first‐month mortality, containing the prothrombin ratio and the antithrombin activity values in addition to the age, the hemoglobin concentration, and the SAPS‐II and SOFA scores (AUC 0.889, SD 0.026), was found to be superior to the SAPS‐II and SOFA scores, the optimized cut‐off value having a high NPV (0.952; 95% CI 0.888–1.000). Conclusions: In patients admitted to an ICU with septic shock, some initial coagulation test values can help identify those who will survive in the first week and then in the first month.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538783622105441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02895.x; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=40949121909&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18194420; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1538783622105441
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know