Are brighter eggs better? Egg color and parental investment by House Wrens

Recent work suggests that avian egg color could be a sexually selected signal to males that provides information about female condition, female genetic quality, or maternal investment in eggs. Theory predicts that egg color should influence male investment if it is an honest signal of the marginal fitness returns on paternal investment; a male should invest more in a colorful clutch if that investment increases offspring success more than an equivalent investment in a less colorful clutch. Some experimental support for this hypothesis has been found for species that lay blue eggs containing the pigment biliverdin, a potentially costly antioxidant. However, the brown eggshell pigment protoporphyrin, a pro-oxidant associated with poor female condition, has received less attention as a potential predictor of female quality or investment. We performed a cross-fostering experiment with House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon) in southwest Michigan in 2007 to test whether brown egg color was related to female condition or maternal investment, and whether male provisioning of nestlings was related to egg color. We swapped entire clutches between nests and measured egg characteristics and parental provisioning rates. We found that brighter eggs (i.e., those with less brown pigment) were heavier, and that nestlings that hatched from brighter eggs were fed at higher rates by their foster mothers, but not by their foster fathers. This pattern is consistent with the hypothesis that egg color is a potential signal of egg quality and female investment, but we found no evidence of a male response to this potential signal. This lack of a response could be the result of methodological limitations, a nonadaptive biological constraint, or adaptive indifference because chicks from brighter eggs do not actually yield increasing marginal returns on paternal investment. Clearly, additional study is needed to differentiate among these possibilities. ©2010 The Author(s). Journal compilation ©2010 Association of Field Ornithologists.