Quantitative 16S rDNA-targeted polymerase chain reaction and oligonucleotide hybridization for the detection of Paenibacillus azotofixans in soil and the wheat rhizosphere
FEMS Microbiology Ecology, ISSN: 0168-6496, Vol: 19, Issue: 3, Page: 153-164
1996
- 55Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A molecular method for the detection of Paenibacillus azotofixans in soil and the wheat rhizosphere was developed. The system consisted of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of part of the variable V1 to V4 regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, followed by hybridization with a specific oligonucleotide probe homologous to part of the intervening region. In vitro specificity tests showed that the detection system worked specifically for P. azotofixans strains, and did not detect other Paenibacillus species or species of other bacterial genera. Vegetative cells of a rifampicin resistant P. azotofixans derivative were trackable in Flevo silt loam (FSL) soil in 24 h experiments using both selective plating and most probable number (MPN)-PCR combined with probing, and plate counts parallelled MPN-PCR estimations of numbers of specific targets. MPN-PCR allowed for the detection of down to 10 2 introduced cells per g of dry soil. Introduced P. azotofixans spores did not form colonies on selective plates, but were detectable via PCR. The P. azotofixans populations introduced into the silt loam soil suffered a slow decline of the detectable plate count over a period of 14 days. MPN-PCR revealed a similar decline of the number of specific DNA targets. Greater numbers of targets were found in wheat rhizosphere from Flevo silt loam soil, and these numbers persisted throughout the experiment. Soil drying resulted in enhanced persistence of the target sequences, whereas in a constantly moist soil the numbers of target sequences declined. Rewetting of dried soil resulted in declining target sequence numbers. The MPN-PCR detection method is adequate to assess the impact of stress conditions affecting P. azotofixans in FSL and probably other soils, since it abolishes the need for culturing or specific markers and is direct and unambiguous due to its high specificity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0168649695000887; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-6496(95)00088-7; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029890314&origin=inward; https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00208.x; http://academic.oup.com/femsec/article-pdf/19/3/153/18088816/19-3-153.pdf; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00208.x; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1016/0168-6496(95)00088-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00208.x; https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/19/3/153/558365; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-6496%2895%2900088-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-6496%2895%2900088-7
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know